Budgets & Evidence

Budget Trust Signals Checklist

A working checklist for making proposal budgets easier to trace, verify, and compare with the narrative.

Use this working checklist to make a proposal budget easier to trace and review. It is general guidance, not a universal standard. The controlling solicitation, funder instructions, approved organizational policy, and applicable accounting guidance take precedence.

Salary & Personnel

  • All salaries show FTE calculations (e.g., “0.5 FTE = 50% of $70,000 = $35,000”)
  • Salary levels are appropriate for role and geographic area
  • Benefits use the organization’s approved rates and documented calculation basis
  • Staff time aligns with project activities and timeline

Indirect Costs

  • Indirect rate and calculation base are explained and permitted by the opportunity
  • Basis for indirect calculation is documented
  • If not requesting indirect, explanation is provided

Alignment with Narrative

  • Every significant budget line item is referenced in narrative
  • Budget scope matches narrative scope
  • No unexplained large line items
  • Program costs align with program description

Cost Reasonableness

  • Unit costs are shown where applicable (e.g., “$500 per participant”)
  • Cost per participant/unit has a documented estimate or comparison basis
  • Comparison to similar programs is provided (if available)
  • Large line items include breakdown or explanation

Match & Leverage

  • In-kind match is documented with basis (e.g., “Staff time: $50/hour × 500 hours = $25,000”)
  • Cash match sources are identified
  • Match calculations are transparent
  • Match aligns with funder requirements

Timeline Alignment

  • Costs are distributed across project timeline
  • Year 1 costs align with Year 1 activities
  • Multi-year projects show appropriate cost distribution
  • No unrealistic front-loading or back-loading

Contingency

  • The opportunity and organizational policy permit a contingency line
  • The calculation, intended use, approval control, and treatment of unused funds are explained
  • If contingency is prohibited, no contingency line is included

Detail & Accuracy

  • Repeated round numbers have a documented estimate basis
  • All required line items are included (travel, supplies, etc.)
  • Budget math is correct (check totals)
  • Budget format matches funder requirements

Red Flags to Avoid

  • Round numbers everywhere
  • Missing standard line items (travel, supplies, etc.)
  • Unrealistic cost per unit
  • No explanation for significant line items
  • Budget doesn’t match narrative scope
  • Math errors or inconsistencies

Final Review

  • Budget tells a coherent story
  • Every line item supports the narrative
  • Calculations are transparent and verifiable
  • Budget aligns with the documented delivery plan and organizational capacity

This working checklist is part of the Wellridge Group resource library at wellridgegroup.com/resources. Adapt it to your governing requirements and accountable human review.